Is the Web fuelling a crisis in politics?
One of my team came across this interesting report on the BBC website regarding the impact of the internet on politics in the UK. For convenience, I have appended the full report below. The report suggests that Blogs tend to generate hostile comment against politicians whereas what is required to address the largely ‘quality of life’ challenges faced by society today is a richer and more constructive engagement between the citizen and the politician. I would hope that my Blog and others will help to bring about a balanced and broadly-based dialogue between citizens and politicians in Ireland. I would be interested to get your comments on the role of the internet in this regard.
Áine
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Web ‘fuelling crisis in politics’
By Brian Wheeler, Political reporter, BBC News, 17th November 2006
Tony Blair’s outgoing chief strategy adviser fears the internet could be fuelling a “crisis” in the relationship between politicians and voters.
Matthew Taylor - who stressed he was speaking as a “citizen” not a government spokesman - said the web could be “fantastic” for democracy.
But it was too often used to encourage the “shrill discourse of demands” that dominated modern politics.
He was speaking on the day Mr Blair carried out an online interview.
Mr Taylor said Mr Blair’s online grilling from voters - and other initiatives such as environment secretary David Miliband’s blog and Downing Street’s new online petition service - showed the government was making good progress in using the internet to become more open and accountable.
But he said more needed to be done by the web community in general to encourage people to use the internet to “solve problems” rather than simply abuse politicians or make “incommensurate” demands on them.
‘Teenagers’
Speaking at an e-democracy conference in central London, he said modern politics was all about “quality of life” and that voters had a “very complex set of needs”.
The internet has immense potential but we face a real problem if the main way in which that potential expresses itself is through allowing citizens to participate in a shrill discourse of demands
The end of deference, the rapid pace of social change and growing diversity were all good things, he argued, but they also meant governments found it increasingly difficult to govern.
“We have a citizenry which can be caricatured as being increasingly unwilling to be governed but not yet capable of self-government,” Mr Taylor told the audience.
Like “teenagers”, people were demanding, but “conflicted” about what they actually wanted, he argued.
They wanted “sustainability”, for example, but not higher fuel prices, affordable homes for their children but not new housing developments in their town or village.
‘Impoverished relationship’
But rather than work out these dilemmas in partnership with their elected leaders, they were encouraged to regard all politicians as corrupt or “mendacious” by the media, which he described as “a conspiracy to maintain the population in a perpetual state of self-righteous rage”.
Whether media was left wing or right wing, the message was always that “leaders are out there to shaft you”.
He went on: “At a time at which we need a richer relationship between politicians and citizens than we have ever had, to confront the shared challenges we face, arguably we have a more impoverished relationship between politicians and citizens than we have ever had.
“It seems to me this is something which is worth calling a crisis.”
Blogs
The internet, he told the conference, was part of that “crisis”.
“The internet has immense potential but we face a real problem if the main way in which that potential expresses itself is through allowing citizens to participate in a shrill discourse of demands.
“If you look at the way in which citizens are using technology and the way that is growing up, there are worrying signs that that is the case.
“What is the big breakthrough, in terms of politics, on the web in the last few years? It’s basically blogs which are, generally speaking, hostile and, generally speaking, basically see their job as every day exposing how venal, stupid, mendacious politicians are.
“The internet is being used as a tool of mobilisation, which is fantastic, but it only adds to the growing, incommensurate nature of the demands being made on government.”
He challenged the online community to provide more opportunities for “people to try to understand the real trade-offs that politicians face and the real dilemmas that citizens face”.
‘Anti-establishment’
“I want people to have more power, but I want them to have more power in the context of a more mature discourse about the responsibilities of government and the responsibilities of citizens,” Mr Taylor told delegates.
Part of the problem, he added, was the “net-head” culture itself, which was rooted in libertarianism and “anti-establishment” attitudes.
He told delegates: “You have to be part of changing that culture. It’s important for people who understand technology, to move from that frame of mind, which is about attacking the establishment into one which is about problem-solving and social enterprise.”
Technology should be used to encourage elected representatives to communicate better with voters, he told delegates.
Government also needed to “develop new forms of consultation and engagement that are deliberative in their form and trust citizens to get to the heart of the difficult trade-offs involved.”
And there should be more effort to make communities “work together to solve problems,” said Mr Taylor.
Mr Taylor is Tony Blair’s chief adviser on political strategy and the former head of the centre left think tank the Institute of Public Policy Research (IPPR).
He is leaving Downing Street next week, after three years, to become the chief executive of the Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts (RSA).
May 17th, 2007 at 11:04 pm
the character of politics is vital in this regard. if our politicians see the debate on blogs and other social media as below them, then it is a recipe for disaster and conflict. If however (as you and some others do) politicians debate and engage with voters on blogs (even if they are negative) it can only instil confidence in citizens that their voices are heard.
That is what it boils down to. Apathy in politics revolves around recognition of voice and debate.
May 18th, 2007 at 8:11 am
Hostile comments? What do you expect when you make statements like this?
http://eastmeath.org/blog/?p=215
What is needed to generate quality of life is proper planning and development. In parts of Meath and Kildare poor quality of life is DIRECTLY ATTRIBUTABLE to councillors ignoring regional planning guidelines and zoning land in the absence of funding for infrastructure or local employment generation.
If people weren’t commuting 3 hours a day then maybe they would have the time and energy to engage.
May 18th, 2007 at 8:35 am
Áine. I honestly think you, or one of your team, should go read some Irish blogs and see what really is being said and how it is being said, rather than using a BBC report as your base reference.
Bear in mind that the traditional media, BBC included, are still apprehensive about, perhaps even fear, blogging, and dismiss it as ‘amateur journalism’. Hence they are not an unbiased source.
May 18th, 2007 at 1:04 pm
Hi Aine !
“Is the Web fuelling a crisis in politics?”
No , Aine . In my opinion , politicians like yourself are fuelling that crisis .
And here is what I intend to do about it -
http://11sixtynine.blogsome.com/2007/05/10/send-a-message-on-may-24-spoil-your-vote/
Sharon.
May 19th, 2007 at 3:43 pm
I’d agree with James on the need to look at Irish blogs and discussion boards, because quite a different picture emerges to that described in the BBC report. In addition to James’ sensible comment that the free flow of information on the internet can be seen as a threat to establish media, I think we also have to guard against our habit of assuming anything we see on the UK agenda is relevant to here.
In the Irish case, I think we’re simply in a situation where the political system has become disconnected from the reality we live in to an extent to which it has become incapable of engaging with issues. Plenty of examples can be taken. One might be the whole folderol over the decentralisation programme - -ultimately an irrelevant policy, which does nothing for regional development, but fumbling on for no apparent reason. At the same time substantial issues go unanswered - for example, the need to put some kind of rationality on regional development. Like many, I think the National Spatial Strategy cast the net too wide to be meaningful. But the political system seems incapable of implementing even that.
We could go on (and on and on), but I think the key point I want to make is that what I tend to see in Irish online debates are the neglected agendas that the political system seems incapable of grasping. That’s a very different reality to that depicted in the BBC article, and I’d hate to thing that article was being taken as comfort for believing that Irish voters are ‘increasingly unwilling to be governed but not yet capable of self-government’. I think the reality is the opposite. Irish people are waiting to be governed. They are waiting for a Government that, for example, will negotiate from a position of strength as the funder of education to help primary schools evolve from Church management to community management in response to our changing lives.
The currency of Irish politics used to be clientelism - asking you local TD to advocate your case and, frequently, getting no more out of the transaction than a polite letter from the relevant Minister. That kind of old nonsense is hardly of any relevance now. Do politicians still have a nostalgia for that kind of thing?
May 20th, 2007 at 1:13 am
Aine, there must be something in the Fianna Fáil water at the moment in questioning the blogosphere and their right to comment/participate in electoral discourse.
Unfortunately for many FF candidates, they have some campaigners or other people who don’t really understand the way in which new social media works doing a bit of work on blogs and websites - candidates should do their research themselves so that they don’t end up posting comments like that above and showing how little they know about what is going on.
June 8th, 2007 at 5:38 am
So this blog was merely an election poster and is now surplus to requirements?
June 29th, 2007 at 3:28 pm
I must agree with James above that it is very disappointing to see that this website was just an election tool and nothing has been added since the election of Aine to Dail Eireann. I was cynical with all the post at the time of the election, but still disappointed to see that it was just a ploy to feign interest in the community. No wonder people are cynical about politics in this country.
November 15th, 2007 at 2:53 pm
Hi Aine.
Delighted to see your blog is still up and running, how dare Glenn and James claim that this was just an election tool! though on reflection you have been a little quiet lately, in any case i was wondering what you are doing in relation to one of your key objectives, TRANSPORT! Now that the Maynooth Line has been dubbed the Calcutta express, what changes are you proposing to ease the pain of the commuter. I don’t suppose you use the service yourself?
Looking forward to your answer,
Liam.